Placeholder image

Know Your Tech

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

Last updated on October 28, 2025

The following information is produced by the ACLU of Oregon for educational purposes only. This is not intended to be and is not a substitute for legal advice.

Police departments and private companies across the U.S. are increasingly investing in mass surveillance tools in the name of public safety and crime reduction. Often, these tools are used to track and document First Amendment activity, chill free speech, and to police and target Black and brown communities.

Learn more about the types of surveillance technology that Oregon cities and counties are employing below.

Related Content

Resource
Placeholder image
  • Police Practices|
  • +2 Issues

Know Your Rights: Encountering Law Enforcement and Military Troops in Oregon

The following information is produced by the ACLU of Oregon for educational purposes only. This is not intended to be and is not a substitute for legal advice.
Resource
Placeholder image

Campaigns

Court Case
Oct 20, 2025
Flock Automated License Plate Readers
  • Privacy & Technology|
  • +1 Issue

May v. City of Eugene

The ACLU of Oregon and our legal partners, Visible Law and LeDuc Montgomery LLC, filed to sue the City of Eugene for failing to disclose public records pertaining to the city’s operation of Flock Safety cameras. This lawsuit is filed on behalf of Seth May, a member of Eyes Off Eugene, a group of advocates and technology professionals who are rejecting mass surveillance in Oregon through public education and organized advocacy. Flock cameras are a type of advanced surveillance technology that presents a significant threat to privacy by tracking the movements of every vehicle (and even images of pedestrians, bicyclists, and animals), without a warrant, suspicion, or consent from the public. Flock allows for this personal data to be uploaded to an AI-powered platform that can be accessed by law enforcement and private companies across the country, with little to no regulation. Learn more about Flock’s disturbing web of surveillance and data sharing on our Know Your Tech Flock page. By denying Mr. May’s request and refusing to disclose the requested records, the City violated Oregon public records law. The City of Eugene’s refusal to disclose the records despite the significant public interest in them stands in stark contrast to the transparency that other cities like Springfield, Medford, and Woodburn have provided the public by identifying the locations of Flock cameras without issue. The ACLU of Oregon and our legal partners are representing Mr. May and suing the City of Eugene to ensure that the City of Eugene cannot hide their actions while demanding the public live their lives under the unblinking eyes of Flock.
Press Release
Oct 20, 2025
Flock Automated License Plate Readers
  • Police Practices|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU of Oregon and partners sue City of Eugene for failing to disclose public records on Flock cameras

Today, the ACLU of Oregon and its legal partners, Visible Law and LeDuc Montgomery LLC, filed to sue the City of Eugene for failing to disclose public records pertaining to the city’s operation of Flock Safety cameras.
Court Cases: May v. City of Eugene