A group of over 450 public health experts signed a public letter today warning that widespread transmission of the Covid-19 coronavirus within the United States is “inevitable.” Their letter urges government decisionmakers to enact policies that will have the best chance of minimizing the effects of the virus: those based strictly on the best available scientific information, and those that are imposed in a fair and equitable fashion.

It is essential that all government officials follow these experts’ recommendations to help ensure a response plan that protects the health, safety, and civil liberties of all.

At the ACLU, we have always recognized that, during a disease outbreak, individual rights must sometimes give way to the greater good. After all, when it comes to disease, we are not just individuals but also one big bio-mass. That is why people can sometimes be deprived of their liberty through quarantine, for example. And this is as it should be, provided — and this is a crucial and sometimes violated condition — that the science supports the effectiveness and proportionality of measures such as quarantine. And even if a quarantine is imposed, people do not lose their due process rights, which at a minimum require that they be able to challenge their quarantine.

The public health experts remind us in their letter that there is a flip side to the limits on liberty, however. Just as a disease cares little for our notions of individualism — as crucial as they are to our happiness in other contexts — neither does it care about other artifacts of our individualistic society, such as differences in wealth, status, ethnicity, or immigration status. If the authorities want to be effective in limiting the transmission of this virus, they will need to pay particular attention to the most vulnerable people in our society.

A disease does not care who has health insurance, for example. You may have the best insurance in the world, but if 30 million others who are part of your bio-mass are not getting tested or treated because they lack insurance, that will increase your risk. Similarly, if members of immigrant communities fear they’re going to fall into the hands of an ICE officer if they seek treatment, that is a public health problem for all of us. A disease does not care who is undocumented.

In their letter, the public health experts call for officials to work with insurance companies to make sure that lack of insurance and high costs do not become a barrier to testing and treatment. They call for health care facilities to be declared as “immigration enforcement-free zones” — a step that has been taken before during hurricanes and other emergencies. And they call for extra help to be provided to under-resourced front-line hospitals and community health centers, which need more help than wealthy institutions in acquiring materials and equipment.

The experts draw attention to the need to support minimum-wage workers and others who live on the economic margins, cannot telecommute, and cannot afford to lose their job. While an office worker who is starting to feel ill may be able to self-isolate, someone in a more precarious situation may calculate the different risks they face in their life and conclude their only option is to hide their condition and head to work. A disease does not care whose employers offer good sick leave.

The experts also stress the importance of the free flow of information, stressing that “honest, transparent and timely reporting of developments will be crucial to maintaining public trust and cooperation.” Political leaders need to scrupulously ensure that their public messages are accurate and guided by science. There is a sad history of responses to emergencies that are hindered by politics, including China’s response to the SARS outbreak, China’s attempts to repress information about this outbreak, and, as millions of viewers have seen in the recent HBO series, the Soviet government’s response to the Chernobyl disaster. Open government is effective government.

Finally, the experts echo some of the longstanding lessons of their field: Voluntary self-isolation measures are more likely to induce cooperation — and therefore be effective — than coercive measures. Mandatory restrictions such as quarantines and travel bans “can be effective only under specific circumstances” and “must be guided by science, with appropriate protection of the rights of those impacted.” Those rights include due process rights to appeal confinement and the right to legal counsel. While leaders in outbreaks can be tempted to impose draconian measures as a show of strength, the letter’s signers also remind us that a disease also does not care how tough a leader looks.

The ACLU will be watching closely to make sure the government heeds these experts’ recommendations, and that its response is ​scientifically justified and no more intrusive on civil liberties than absolutely necessary.

Date

Monday, March 2, 2020 - 5:15pm

Featured image

A gloved hand injects fluid into a test tube.

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

ACLU: Share image

Show related content

Author:
Jay Stanley, ACLU Senior Policy Analyst

Menu parent dynamic listing

26

Imported from National NID

29337

Imported from National VID

29353

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Imported from National Link

The ACLU of Oregon is seriously concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on incarcerated people and legal system workers in our state. 14,000 Oregonians, many elderly and already in poor health, are currently confined in unhygienic, small, and densely populated jail and prison cells. Our justice system can’t afford to stay stagnant in this pandemic. Action now is important for the health of all of us.

We teamed up with Disability Rights Oregon, Partnership For Safety & Justice, the Oregon Justice Resource Center, the Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, and Sponsors, Inc. to offer help and urge immediate action. Together, we sent joint letters to Oregon’s legal system leaders to share science- and civil liberties-backed risk-reduction recommendations. 

From policing, prosecution and pretrial hearings, to sentencing, confinement, and release, every aspect of the system must come under intense scrutiny for how it responds to this crisis. The well-being of our communities depends on government officials, policymakers, and law enforcement following the guidance of public health experts with swift and science-based policy changes to reduce the justice system’s footprint. 

We are grateful for the officials and law enforcement agencies who have already been responsive, transparent, collaborative, innovative, adaptable. We need bold action now to stop the spread of COVID-19. 

  • Governor Kate Brown
    We recommended Governor Brown create an executive task force that could operate, executive orders she could implement, and detailed how she could expedite the release of vulnerable people incarcerated in Oregon.
     
  • Oregon Department of Corrections
    We called on the Oregon Department of Corrections to follow nearly 30 specific recommendations involving medical treatment, staffing, communication and access to the courts, population management, and transparency.
     
  • Oregon’s Chief Justice and State Court Administrator
    To Oregon Chief Justice Martha Walters and State Court Administrator Nancy Cozine we highlighted 19 measures that courts could implement to help public health.
     
  • Oregon State Sheriffs Association 
    To the Oregon State Sheriffs Association – whose members oversee all the county jails – we encouraged them to reduce their jail populations, increase cell and personal hygiene for inmates and staff, increase screening, collaborate with local hospitals, and ten other necessary steps.
     
  • Oregon District Attorneys Association 
    To the Oregon District Attorneys Association – whose members are among the most important players in the criminal justice system – we detailed nine simple ways they can wield their authority to limit the spread of COVID-19. 
     
  • Special Joint Legislative Committee on Coronavirus Response
    We urged the Oregon Legislature to appropriate emergency funding to support the health of those in custody, allow for expedited release review of vulnerable people in our state prisons, and to fund services that support their safe and healthy reentry into the community.

We also teamed up with the Oregon Ready immigrants’ rights coalition, made up of more than two dozen community groups, to call on ICE and Portland’s immigration court to take swift action to protect public health. The coronavirus pandemic is impacting all Oregonians, regardless of their legal status. 

  • ICE and the Portland Immigration Court
    We called for the immediate suspension of all ICE field operations, the release of people incarcerated at the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, the closure of the Portland Immigration Court and extension of deadlines, and for transparency in all their actions. 

Date

Friday, March 20, 2020 - 7:15am

Featured image

An image of empty prison cells. Are prisons ready for the ensuing COVID-19 pandemic?

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Documents

Show related content

Author:
Kelly Simon, Interim Legal Director

Menu parent dynamic listing

26

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

March 18, 2020

The following is testimony the we and our partners provided today to the state's Special Joint Legislative Committee on Coronavirus Response regarding safety and civil rights for incarcerated Oregonians.  

Co-Chairs Roblan and Holvey, and Members of the Committee,

The response to the global pandemic COVID-19 requires careful consideration of the public health and economic impacts on the people of Oregon and the institutions that provide critical services for our state. This is no different for our state’s prisons and jails, or for victim services agencies. We urge the government in its response to prioritize saving human lives, public safety, and reducing new infections to partner with our organizations and law enforcement agencies across the state and take swift action to prevent the outbreak of COVID-19 in our prisons and jails.

An ideal response is one that brings partners together in shared and diverse expertise; that in this scenario would be coordinated between public safety, public health and victims services professionals. A collaborative response will also take into account the unique risks and dangers to those experiencing stalking, domestic and sexual violence during this time and their need for adequate protections while we call for only the most essential hearings to be held. The process should also involve hearing from people directly impacted, including incarcerated people, formerly incarcerated people and crime victims as do how these policy and practice changes are working. Their voices are critical to informing how we move forward.

People in prisons and jails are highly vulnerable to outbreaks of contagious illnesses. Once a contagious illness enters, conditions in correctional facilities are highly conducive to it spreading. People in prisons and jails live in close proximity to each other. Many are housed in large dormitories, sharing the same space. People in prisons and jails do not have access to adequate soap and cleaning supplies, making infection control nearly impossible.

Many people in prisons and jails are in relatively poor health and suffer from serious chronic conditions due to lack of access to healthcare in the community, or limited healthcare provided in the correctional system. Medical staff are generally stretched thin even in the best of times. Though incarcerated people have a constitutional right to adequate medical and mental health care, the reality is they too often do not have access to it.

All this means that prison and jail populations are extremely vulnerable to a contagious illness like COVID-19. Moreover, prisoners have fewer options for protecting themselves and others. They don’t have the option to stay away from other people when they are sick. They can ask for medical attention, but prisons and jails have few infirmary beds and fewer rooms for medical isolation.

From policing, prosecution and pretrial hearings, to sentencing, confinement, and release, every aspect of the system must come under intense scrutiny for how it responds to this national public health crisis.

While our organizations strongly recommend additional actions1, we are encouraged by recent actions taken by Chief Justice Martha Walter that limit nonessential court operations statewide to limit traffic in and out of courthouses and stem the spread of the coronavirus. Similar to actions taken in other states like Ohio, the Washington County Sheriff has also announced he will be taking steps to reduce the jail population by considering early release for individuals meeting certain criteria.2 We encourage other Sheriffs to take similar actions.

Our organizations have reached out to several law enforcement offices and associations to share our concerns and offer suggested actions they can take to protect prison and jail populations as well as those on active supervision and uphold public safety in our state. Those letters are attached and suggested actions include:

  • Transparency with incarcerated individuals and their families, and the public regarding actions being taken by law enforcement agencies is paramount throughout this public health emergency. It is equally important for jail and prison staff and incarcerated individuals to receive the same information and education about how to best combat COVID-19 and how to recognize the symptoms. The information provided should be accessible regardless of a person’s disability or primary language.
  • Law enforcement officers need to balance their enforcement priorities with the realities of the pandemic. Police agencies need to rethink how arrests can be avoided or deprioritized to reduce the public health risks of unnecessary jailing. The Oregon Department of Corrections and Oregon jails should also refrain from transferring people to ICE custody, providing information to ICE that allows for their re-arrest upon release, or delaying anyone’s release as a result of an ICE request.
  • Prosecutors should use their immense discretion to reduce the number of people who are held pretrial or who are sentenced to a confined facility. This includes making full use of available diversion programs or alternatives that don’t involve confinement and offering non-confinement sentences in plea bargaining.
  • The Parole Board should expand release opportunities and expedite release decisions for incarcerated people.
  • The Governor should utilize her clemency powers to decrease incarcerated populations and create a culture in which transparency, safety, and the health of all people are paramount concerns.
  • Prisons, jails, and detention centers must be developing plans to protect people. They must provide soap, hand sanitizer, and cleaning supplies.
  • Parole and Probation departments should relax reporting requirements, decrease the use of custodial sanctions, waive monthly reporting fees and look for ways to support the people they are supervising so they do not lose their employment and housing during this crisis.

We request that the Joint Committee on Coronavirus Response address this critical issue by doing the following:

  • Appropriate emergency funding to reentry and treatment programs across the state so that individuals can be diverted away or released back into the community fully supported, resourced and educated.
  • Appropriate emergency funding to the Oregon Department of Corrections so it may adequately address the needs of this current crisis and mitigate the harms that will be caused by this crisis.
  • Appropriate emergency funding to the Board of Parole and the Governor’s office to support the expedited release of individuals through the clemency and parole process.

People in custody, including in prisons, jails, and civil detention, are often forgotten in emergencies. This creates unnecessary suffering and loss of life. We have the opportunity to take steps now to limit the spread of the virus in prisons, jails, and detention centers. But the time to act for the health of those incarcerated, and for the broader community, is now.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

ACLU of Oregon

Disability Rights oregon

Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association

Oregon Justice Resource Center

Partnership For Safety & Justice

Sponsors, Inc.

Hide banner image

Show featured video/image

Show related content

Date

Wednesday, March 18, 2020 - 8:15pm

Documents

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Session

2020 JOINT SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE

Status

Menu parent dynamic listing

25

Show PDF in viewer on page

Show list numbers

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Oregon RSS