Free Speech

The framers of the U.S. Constitution believed that the freedom of inquiry and liberty of expression were the hallmarks of a democratic society. The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights provides protections in a number of areas including free speech.

ferguson protest

What you need to know

1920

Since the 1920s, the ACLU has been involved in virtually all of the landmark speech cases to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

1997

In a landmark 1997 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the ACLU’s argument that the Internet itself is a free-speech zone.

“[W]e have little trouble in concluding that the people who framed and adopted Article I, section 8, as part of the original Oregon Constitution intended to prohibit broadly any laws directed at restraining verbal or nonverbal expression of ideas of any kind.”
-- State v. Ciancanelli
(Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)

The framers of the U.S. Constitution believed that the freedom of inquiry and liberty of expression were the hallmarks of a democratic society. The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights provides protections in a number of areas including free speech.

The framers of the Oregon free speech equivalent, often referred to as our free expression provision, were even more protective of our rights.

Historically, at times of national stress, real or imagined free speech rights come under enormous pressure. During the “Red Scare” of the 1920s, thousand were deported for their political views. During the McCarthy period, the infamous blacklist ruined lives and careers. Today, protestors of U.S. government policies are attacked and creators, producers and distributors of popular culture are often blamed for the nation’s deep social problems.

Calls for censorship threaten to erode free speech.

The First Amendment and Oregon’s free expression provision protect popular speech and the most offensive and controversial speech from government suppression. The best way to counter obnoxious speech is with more speech. Persuasion, not coercion, is the solution.

The Latest

News & Commentary
October 2025 Newsletter

Newsletter: October 2025

See what we have been up to this fall!
Resource
Placeholder image

Know Your Rights: Encountering Law Enforcement and Military Troops in Oregon

The following information is produced by the ACLU of Oregon for educational purposes only. This is not intended to be and is not a substitute for legal advice.
Resource
Placeholder image

Home

News & Commentary
groups of protesters in front of glass doors.

Community is the Antidote to Immobilization

“The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any.” — Alice Walker
Court Case
Aug 17, 2022

City of Medford v. April Rosemary Fonseca

Court Case
Aug 05, 2020

ACLU of Oregon et al v. Portland

Court Case
Aug 26, 2020

Pettibone et al v. Biden et al

Court Case
Jan 24, 2022

Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides et al v U.S. Department of Homeland Security

The ACLU of Oregon filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit challenging DHS’s use of chemical munitions during the 2020 racial justice protests, in violation of environmental law.