Criminal System Reform

The rights guaranteed to individuals under suspicion, criminal defendants, and prisoners are fundamental rights that protect all Americans from governmental abuse of power.

Jury box in a stately courtroom

“[L]awyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries. The right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours.”
— Justice Hugo Black,
Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963

The rights guaranteed to individuals under suspicion, criminal defendants, and prisoners are fundamental rights that protect all Americans from governmental abuse of power. These rights include the guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure, the right to reasonable bail, the right against self incrimination, the right to counsel, the right to be acquitted unless the government can prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the right to a jury of one’s peers and the right to be free from cruel and unusual treatment.

These protections were included in our federal and state constitutions in order to protect innocent persons who may be wrongfully suspected or accused of a crime. The framers understood that it is more important for the government to follow the rule of law than it is to obtain a guilty verdict in every case.

The Latest


News & Commentary
A woman speaking at a rally for asylum.

2023 at the ACLU: Our Year in Stories

This year saw more battles, advocacy, and victories than ever before — look back on them through some of our biggest blogs.
News & Commentary
Right to Rest poster

Report: Decriminalizing Homelessness in Oregon

 Do I sleep in the park and violate the camping ban, or do I trespass onto private property? Where can I go to the bathroom? Where can I set my stuff down without attracting attention from police?Homelessness and housing are a growing problem in Oregon.  The region has seen the third highest increase in homelessness nationwide, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In 2015, HUD counted 13,100 adults and children experiencing homelessness in Oregon. Of those Oregonians experiencing homelessness, HUD found one-in-ten was a military veteran, one-in-seven was identified as having a serious mental illness
Press Release
DSPDX v ODOJ collage

ACLU of Oregon Petitions Attorney General on Behalf of Don’t Shoot Portland for Public Records

The ACLU of Oregon and Don’t Shoot Portland are petitioning the Oregon Attorney General to review the Oregon Department of Justice (ODOJ)’s refusal to disclose public records relating to the Oregon TITAN Fusion Center (OTFC).
News & Commentary
People attend a rally against the Trump administration's 90-day funding freeze and job cuts at health agencies in Washington, DC, hold up a large sign written in red, green and black on cardboard that reads " DON'T DEFUND THE FUTURE."

Voters Reject President Trump’s Dystopian Plans for “Public Safety”

We’re on the Hill this week telling Congress to fund real solutions

Cases, Campaigns & Legislation


Court Case
Oct 19, 2026

Don’t Shoot Portland v. Oregon Department of Justice

Don’t Shoot Portland and ACLU of Oregon are two Oregon nonprofits dedicated to advocating for racial justice, police accountability, and the right to protest. In 2024, both organizations submitted public records requests to illuminate how Oregon TITAN Fusion Center (OFTC) works with other law enforcement agencies to monitor and surveil Oregonians engaged in lawful advocacy and protest — including for racial justice. The OTFC is a federally funded domestic surveillance program housed under the Oregon Department of Justice’s Criminal Intelligence Unit that works closely with federal law enforcement agencies like the increasingly notorious Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The OTFC operates as part of a vast nationwide network of about 80 similar fusion center programs nationwide. For two decades, OTFC has operated with little oversight or transparency while purporting to collect, analyze, and disseminate information about “terrorism” and crime in Oregon. However, the OTFC, like other fusion centers across the country, has a checkered history of abuses. ODOJ withheld nearly 2000 records from its response — largely the ones it said the ACLU would be “most interested in” — based on its “Third Agency Rule,” which it said requires OTFC to keep records it receives from other agencies confidential. The Petition argues that rule cannot displace ODOJ’s obligations under the Public Records Law. The disputed records include “Criminal Intelligence Unit Bulletin[s]” issued by the Portland Police Bureau that name Don’t Shoot Portland (sometimes referred to as Don’t Shoot PDX) and “Criminal Intelligence Unit Protest [and] Significant Event Information Briefs” that name Sean Kealiher, a founding organizer of Don’t Shoot PDX’s community action plan who was killed in 2019 at age 23. The existence of the records suggests additional evidence of OTFC’s improper surveillance of people and groups engaged in protected political and noncriminal activities. Plaintiffs urge the Attorney General to reject ODOJ’s reliance on the Third Agency Rule as blanket authority to withhold records from the public. The people of Oregon deserve transparency about how state, local, and federal police cooperation affects their rights and freedoms.
Court Case
Aug 18, 2023

State of Oregon v. Izzy Guajardo-McClinton

Campaign
Nov 2025

2023 Legislative Session Hub

Dive into the ACLU of Oregon’s 2023 Legislative Session policy priority agenda. See you in the legislature, from January to June 2023.
Campaign
Sep 2026

Student Know Your Rights

A hub for students and youth to explore information on their rights and freedoms in Oregon public schools!